Bamblog

Achtung - das Bamblog wird seit Mitte Oktober 2007 nicht mehr aktualisiert. Bitte besuchen Sie mein neues Weblog unter http://www.schmidtmitdete.de. Danke! - Please note that this blog is no longer active. You can find my new blog at http://www.schmidtmitdete.de. Thanks for visiting!

The FoNK (Research Centre ‘New Communication Media’) has published a new working paper which I have written together with my research assistants Martin Wilbers and Matthias Paetzolt. Based on data from our “Wie ich blogge?!”-surveys [1], we analyzed the use of and the satisfaction with different blogging software.

Schmidt, Jan / Wilbers, Martin / Paetzolt, Matthias (2006): Use of and satisfaction with blogging software. Empirical findings for the german-speaking blogosphere. Research Centre ‘New Communication Media’ Working Paper, No. 06-04. Bamberg. Available online: http://www.fonk-bamberg.de/pdf/fonkpaper0604.pdf.

Here’s the abstract:

Blog software is an important structural aspect of blogging practices, since the various functionalities built into the code frame, but not determine, actual use. It is also subject to ongoing change, either through innovations in the software itself, or through the (re-)combination of different tools. This working paper reports findings on the use of and the satisfaction with blogging software for the german-speaking blogosphere. By comparing users of stand-alone software and blogging software as well as comparing Wordpress users to users of different stand-alone systems, the study brings differences in the respective user bases to light, for example in regard to gender and age. The findings also show how changes in the technical base lead to different levels of satisfaction, with lack of functionalities being a major reason for changing the software. The paper concludes with a short outlook on possible future research that takes software as a defining characteristic of blogging practices into account but avoids fallacies of technological or social determinism.

[1] An english paper on the key results of the survey is currently under review at a journal. Some general information in english can be found here.